(no subject)

Date: 2023-06-27 09:52 pm (UTC)
thekumquat: (Default)
From: [personal profile] thekumquat
The time of divergence is also relevant to the UK. Children growing up thinking their mother was actually their older sister was still possible in the 1950s when many babies were born at home, ditto some casual adoptions.

But adoption of newborn babies pretty much died out by 1980 thanks to access to contraception and abortion - certainly by the 1990s when the internet came along, there was a huge cultural gulf between the UK and the US. Adopting a (healthy, white) baby was still possible in the US, but in the UK adoptions were almost exclusively of older children (plus adoption by stepparents), who had been taken into care by the local authority 'the council', ie local government's Social Services.

Unless the scenario is one where access to contraception and abortion have been hugely limited, the concept of someone getting that far in pregnancy then deciding she wants to give the baby away, doesn't really compute. It sounds more like a surrogacy arragement - possibly because surrogacy in the UK is not allowed to be paid for?
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

little_details: An open book with a magnifying glass sitting on top of it, with the name Little Details written above. (Default)Little Details

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 02:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios