dreadlordmrson: The Eye of Dread. (Default)
[personal profile] dreadlordmrson posting in [community profile] little_details
Would hospital care after minor dog attack injuries expose a first trimester pregnancy?

Details:
I have a story I'm currently working on set in a modern type world, and a plot point where one of the two main characters is attacked by a pack of street dogs and gets some minor scratch and bite injuries. I'm thinking just a few stitches at most. I can guess they'll need "just in case" antibiotics and rabies shots because of the bites, but would common care involve any tests that would expose an early pregnancy?

Goals:
I'm trying to keep the pregnancy a surprise for the other main character later in the story, so a "some hospitals would do these tests but some wouldn't" could be ruled that this time it wasn't done. But if it's very common to do certain blood or other tests that would easily reveal a pregnancy, that's a problem. And having the other main character who's acting as their savior/caregiver in this scenario decide not to get them treatment wouldn't be in character or suit his arc in the story, even with minor wounds that in theory could be treated at home.

Do I need to change details of the attack, or depict this medical team as negligent? Or is the stealth of this pregnancy safe?

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 02:30 am (UTC)
winterbird: (calm - blue moonflower)
From: [personal profile] winterbird
There's a chance, tbh, because a very common question before certain antibiotics and vaccines (and they might want to do a tetanus as well) is "is there any possibility you could be pregnant?" - If the answer is yes, or 'maybe,' that's probably when they'll do a urine or blood test or something similar to double check.

This would rely on the character a) knowing there is a chance and b) that question happening where the other main character isn't around them. Some hospitals, especially post-Covid, don't let companions come through into the actual treatment area, so it might just be that your main character has to wait in the waiting room while your pregnant character gets treated. The last two times I've been in an ER, no one's partner/s or family member/s came through into treatment areas with the exception of parents of very young children, and no one contested that either. So you definitely have a plausible reason to separate them during active treatment.

On the other hand, if both of your characters need the same treatment, I find it difficult to see a way to get them both separated so that your other main character won't hear 'is there any chance you might be pregnant?' Like, these questions are not subtle and they're said in front of everyone (including other patients etc.) in a busy critical care / treatment / rapid response area. This kind of response in a hospital is not a 'you get a private room for treatment' scenario. It's a 'get these meds into you ASAP / get some bloods / get the hell out and come back if you have these symptoms' scenario.

If your main character has any experience with medical stuff, it might be that they just know the question 'could you be pregnant' is coming and pull a staff member aside to tell them while thinking there's very little chance that they actually are - again, they'd have to know / connect the dots between sex + pregnancy, but 'is there any *chance* you could be pregnant' literally just means 'have you had sex recently.' So if they have, they should answer 'yes,' because I'm assuming this isn't an immaculate conception scenario.

There are SO many meds that you will not give someone if they *might* be pregnant, and plenty of antibiotics fit into this category. Especially broad spectrum antibiotics that you might give after a dog attack, like Gentamicin. It's not even about the tests, necessarily, the character is just going to be asked - likely more than once - if there's a chance they could be pregnant. I cannot imagine any scenario where a medical team would be so negligent as to not ask this question, especially as more than one staff member often asks it (it's whoever has the meds at the time).

(I'm not a medical expert but I have been in hospitals/emergency rooms many, many times and have spent thousands of hours dealing with medical stuff and researching medical stuff and I cannot tell you how many times I've had to answer the question 'is there any chance you might be pregnant?' before meds + scans)

Imho the best way to have the other MC not hear about it is probably:

a) other MC goes 'no no you need the treatment more than me you go first I can wait' (and their dog attack is far less severe and/or has no broken skin' - so pregnant MC IS separated from other MC through the "saviour/caregiver" act of 'you need this more than me.'

b) other MC is told that they can't go in with pregnant MC due to limited beds/space (this is less likely / plausible if they come in together with exactly the same issues because it's easy to just get two batches of similar/identical treatment for people who came in together which means you might need to address the severity of other MC's attack)

c) other MC is just separated enough in the treatment area from pregnant MC and the place is noisy enough that they just literally don't hear repeated 'is there any chance you might be pregnant?' - honestly if the rapid response or critical care section is noisy and busy enough, they'd only need to be about 5 beds away from each other to make this possible.

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 03:51 am (UTC)
winterbird: (calm - a second home)
From: [personal profile] winterbird
Tbh if you're doing a world where say, the cat person is a pet (is the world also a dystopia? Because that then makes this pretty easy - except I thought you wanted rescuer main character to not know, and not both characters to not know - in which case I am a bit confused) then there's no reason all medical care questions won't go through rescuer/other character.

But I'm now just confused as to who's not meant to know they're pregnant because it sounds like not just the rescuer but *also* the pregnant person both aren't meant to know? In which case, why would anyone find out at this point in time?

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 04:31 am (UTC)
winterbird: (calm - candle lantern)
From: [personal profile] winterbird
Fwiw, as someone writing dystopian omegaverse currently, happy endings happen in dystopias all the time. You only need to look at our *current* world to see that. A dystopia =/= you not being able to find these characters their happy ending, their contentment and comfort. They just find it within the context of that world, and plenty of people ignore that they're in a dystopia and don't even know that they're in one all the time *gestures wildly at the world right now.*

So as much as that seems an issue now, as long as you're solid on your content warnings (people owning other people as legal pets is always going to be a dystopia even if it's done in the best possible way tbh), there's no reason you can't focus on the things you want to focus on without focusing on the huge downsides. People write contemporary romance etc. all the time without pointing out the dystopian nature of the societies we live in (or without realising they are, say, when they write a love story that has a medical throughline where they're worried about how they're going to afford they're medical care - that's an encounter with a dystopian universe! But we suspend our disbelief more to focus on the romance rather than 'oh shit, politically that really sucks.')

Ymmv of course! But I think you'll be just fine on that front. I find for myself and for my readers, people actually like happy endings happening in dystopias right now (even if the dystopia part is largely in the background and ignored), because well, it's...relatable, and it resonates. We need to know there can be hope and love and care and happiness in hard and unfair worlds, because we're living in one.

So no matter what you decide re: the pregnancy plot (thank you for explaining this!) I think the 'people own hybrids as pets' part will definitely work out.

As to the pregnancy reveal, is it just cat people who exist? Or many types of animal people? Because if that's the case, it might be that you can fold into your worldbuilding that there might be hybrid/cat-people hospitals that specialise in cat-people, but maybe your MC can only find a hospital for humans, and takes them there, and gets the whole 'if anything gets worse make sure you chase this up in a specialist clinic' but...nothing gets worse, and so they just don't?

Idk how much you've thought about medical care in this world (it sounds like a lot so please ignore this!), but we can't take our dogs/cats to the hospital, and hybrids feasibly might not be cared for in every hospital in your universe. Or there might be specialist centres, but where... in the case of an emergency, they'll do what they can for hybrids? Something like 'ah normally I'd go here but they're not open / don't do emergency / are telling me to contact this hospital' etc.

It might be a way to also gloss past questions that are / aren't asked. Or tests that are / aren't done. It could also be a situation where your MC does good medical care in the field and that prevents needing stitches etc. (like if they have butterfly bandages etc. in a First Aid Kit) and flushes the wounds first and so on.

But yeah if you really like this storyline and it does sound like a good, whumpy storyline, rather than killing the storyline you love, you could alter the medical system around the storyline instead? Might actually be easier, especially when it comes to answering 'well why didn't the doctors do X or Y' with 'well they don't specialise in animal hybrids / that's not how medicine works in this world / animal hybrids don't always get consistent care in every health facility.'

Maybe? fdslakjfdsa

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 02:35 am (UTC)
independence1776: Drawing of Maglor with a harp on right, words "sing of honor lost" and "Noldolantë" on the left and bottom, respectively (Default)
From: [personal profile] independence1776
As a woman of child-bearing age, I literally can't get ER-level medical care without peeing into a cup at some point in the process. (As an ambulatory patient without life-threatening issues, that is.) However, what are the patient privacy laws like in your setting? Because HIPAA laws in the US are all about who gets access and who doesn't. If your pregnant character doesn't give consent for the other character to find out, they can't be told. The basic HIPAA page about this.

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 04:14 am (UTC)
magid: (Default)
From: [personal profile] magid
^ This!!!

Actually, even *after* child-bearing age, I still had to pee in the cup, just in case, for a non-zero number of years. Not one time did a medical professional believe my no, nor did they ask further questions about my no (different reasons might have different implications, or make me sound like an actual human adult, I dunno).

eta: In fact, the last time I was in the ER, it was possibly for $SevereKidneyThing, so when they asked me to pee in a cup, I thought they wanted a sample for that. Nope, it was the unauthorized pregnancy test; they had me give a second sample when I had to return to the ER less than 12 hours later, having not dealt with the issue the first time. Gah!
Edited Date: 2026-02-10 04:18 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 03:10 am (UTC)
lilysea: Serious (Default)
From: [personal profile] lilysea
This varies enormously by country

women in the US are FAR more likely to be asked if they are pregnant in the Emergency Department (or given a pregnancy test without prior consent)

than women in Australia are.

As an Australian woman, I've NEVER been asked if I was pregnant in an emergency department, even when I was in my teens/20s/30s/40s.

The only time I have ever been asked re pregnancy was when I was getting an xray of my neck (not at the emergency dept, at a regular xray clinic) and I asked for a lead apron for my abdomen and the tech said "why, are you pregnant?" and when I said no, I just wanna limit my radiation exposure as much as possible, the technician was really grumpy and reluctant to give me the lead apron.

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 03:33 am (UTC)
lilacsigil: 12 Apostles rocks, text "Rock On" (12 Apostles)
From: [personal profile] lilacsigil
I have been to emergency care in Japan, as a cis woman in my 20s, and I was asked once, said no, and they didn't make me do a test. In Australia, I've never been asked unless I was having treatment where it was relevant (X-Ray, radiation therapy, some medications), and in those cases even though I said no, they required a test.

The antibiotics most commonly used for a dog bite would not require them to ask.

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 03:57 am (UTC)
winterbird: (calm - blue moonflower)
From: [personal profile] winterbird
Depending on when you were in your 20s, really effective broad-spectrum antibiotics like Gentamicin may not have been in broad use in Japan yet because antibiotic resistance wasn't as much of a problem as it is now, so the need for so many broad-spectrum antibiotics hadn't yet applied pressure onto hospitals to have easy reach for good ones, but they absolutely are now (just double checked, Gentamicin went into broad ER use in Japan around the 2010's). It might be better to indicate the years in which you were being treated, because unless you were in your 20s in the 2010's/2020's - you might not be up-to-date on the antibiotics they prefer now and the questions they're asking as a result of those antibiotics.

(Gentamicin is a VERY good first-line broad-spectrum antibiotic except when someone is pregnant).

You might find in a modern setting, things have changed a lot. But I'm not sure when you were in your 20s!

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 04:05 am (UTC)
lilacsigil: Jeune fille de Megare statue, B&W (Default)
From: [personal profile] lilacsigil
Good point! I was there before 2010. But where I live now, gentamicin isn't a first-line antibiotic unless the eye or brain is involved (because of the ototoxicity risk).

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 04:33 am (UTC)
winterbird: (calm - blue moonflower)
From: [personal profile] winterbird
Ah I'm in Australia, it's currently the first-line choice for all sepsis possibilities across multiple tertiary hospitals in Western Australia (from someone treated for sepsis in the ER er...four weeks ago). My eyes/brain were not directly involved. (And I was taken off the Gentamicin once they cultured the bacteria and could target it directly, but Sepsis Protocol is to slam the bacteria with a broad spectrum as soon as possible regardless of risks, because a deaf / blind patient is better than a dead one).

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 05:37 am (UTC)
lilacsigil: 12 Apostles rocks, text "Rock On" (12 Apostles)
From: [personal profile] lilacsigil
Also in Australia, though not WA, and gentamicin is absolutely first-line choice for possible sepsis, but not protocol for a standard animal bite unless there's other serious factors involved (e.g. I know someone diabetic who was given gentamicin for a persistent cellulitis infection in their leg, because their healing was poor and they lived in a rural area where they might not receive treatment swiftly enough if it progressed.)

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 03:52 am (UTC)
winterbird: (Default)
From: [personal profile] winterbird
Yeah as an AFAB Australian person I have been aggressively asked this at *least* 3-6 times in the ER in the last 12 months multiple times specifically because of needing broad-spectrum antibiotics (and very specifically Gentamicin).

When was the last time you needed to be treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics in a hospital?

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 04:06 am (UTC)
lilacsigil: 12 Apostles rocks, text "Rock On" (12 Apostles)
From: [personal profile] lilacsigil
DA In my case, 2024 and I wasn't asked, though I also wasn't given gentamicin.

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 03:23 am (UTC)
pallas_rose: Graffiti of a mouth-open, smirking possum face (Default)
From: [personal profile] pallas_rose
Hi hi, trauma surgeon here. The antibiotics they would get for a dog bite are safe in pregnancy, so that wouldn't necessarily trigger a test. If in the US or Europe, you likely would NOT get rabies vax unless there's a real suspicion the dog is rabid. In developing nations w endemic rabies you would get it. BUT you would then get it even if pregnant! So not necessarily a trigger for a pregnancy test either.

Your best bet is radiologic imaging, specifically an XR or even better a CT scan. If you want to keep it an extremity bite, you might have it a puncture close to a hand or wrist bone, and they would be checking for a fracture there.

Happy to answer any follow-ups!

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 03:34 am (UTC)
lilacsigil: 12 Apostles rocks, text "Rock On" (12 Apostles)
From: [personal profile] lilacsigil
+1 on the X-Ray! In my country they only usually ask if it's relevant, and I've been asked and made to do a test in both these circumstances.

It's also a great opportunity to separate the characters - the pregnant one goes off to X-Ray and the non-pregnant one has to wait in ER for someone to come do their stitches.

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 04:01 am (UTC)
winterbird: (calm - allie's treehouse)
From: [personal profile] winterbird
As a random tangent that's not connected to anything, Australia also doesn't have to worry about rabies (we have other viruses that are similar, but rabies isn't a concern here)

It'll make me lose the later tension of the therapy dog plot vs the character's phobia

I think you could still easily have tension here if say, during matching, the therapy dog wanted to take the person past things that made them phobic? (Alleyways, certain articles of clothing etc.) which could create its own tension where it's less 'fear of the dog' and more 'fear of what the dog is exposing them to re: triggers'?

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 04:34 am (UTC)
winterbird: (Default)
From: [personal profile] winterbird
Tbh as with my previous reply, I still think you can have the dog storyline too! There's definitely options. A world with hybrids/cat people/nekos is a world where you can do so much with the medical side of things that grants you a lot of potential freedom to still have the dog attack storyline, so *fingers crossed*

(no subject)

Date: 2026-02-10 05:40 am (UTC)
lilacsigil: 12 Apostles rocks, text "Rock On" (12 Apostles)
From: [personal profile] lilacsigil
So, on the phobia point, my brother was attacked by a dog when he was 5 and I was 7. It was a small dog and he wasn't seriously hurt (though he was bitten on the face and there was a lot of blood) and that was more than enough for me to develop a dog phobia. So why not have the non-pregnant character bitten and the pregnant character pulling the dog away then staying with the bitten person while they get treated?
Page generated Feb. 10th, 2026 08:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios